Dear Mr. Pinar and Mr. Apple,
I just read both of your recent publications on curriculum. Mr. Pinar, chapter one of your second addition, What is Curridulum Therory? book and Mr. Apple, your article, entitled “Grading Obama’s Education Policy.” Upon completion, I have some major connections and personal experiences that I believe would be of interest for reflection upon your pieces of writing.
First, I am currently an administrator at a private school designed for students with special learning needs. This being said, many of our students attend using vouchers or scholarship funds through the state of Ohio. Again, I feel this swing towards choice and giving parents a wider variety of options is the reason that my school is able to run and operate. However, it must be said that our parents seek out our school because of the poor curriculum and programing that the public schools have attempted to use in order to reach their child. They feel as if FAPE is no longer “appropriate” and that their public school experiences are exactly what landed them at my school.
Now, this can be seen as good or bad, depending on your educational paradigm. I tend to feel for those children stuck in ineffective public schools that don’t have parents seeking out options or exercising their right to choose the best placement for their child. Parents often leave the education of their child up to the educations, as they should in many cases. We are the licensed professionals who apparently have the greatest training and resources. However, with all the new policies and standards
in education, public schools, teachers, and administrators are not being seen as that. I agree with you, Pinar, about failing students, not failing teachers. Teachers are human, just as doctors and scientists, businessmen etc. However, when kids are not “passing” or “connecting” or thriving in their educational setting, immediately the teachers are to blame. You go on to talk about how this occurs; “The truth is that disconnecting the curriculum from the students’ interests and teachers’ intellectual passions ensures the “failure to learn””(Pinar, 18.) I related to this so strongly because many of my students are at my school because they simply did not learn the way that the public schools taught. Since they have special learning needs, they needed different approaches, high interest curriculum etc. in order to be successful in any educational setting.
Another way I related to this is this summer; we were hiring two new intervention specialists. It was overwhelming the number of those teachers that were leaving public education so they could “teach” again. They wanted to get back to their passion of teaching and use authentic and organic experiences that catered to the specific population of kids they would be working with. At that point, thought thrilled we had such devoted and qualified applicants, I realized how detrimental this was to the public schools. It said that education, for students and teachers likewise, has lost the foundation of what education used to be; discovery, passionate, interesting, life-long, engagement, investigating, understanding, seeking, etc.
Mr. Apple, you too discuss how the basic foundation of education needs to be in connecting the curriculum to the students. You talked about how Race to the Top will ensure “even more uncreative curricula and teaching, ever more testing and more emphasis on it, and increasingly alienated students and teachers” (Apple, 27). This is just another example that I have seen and lived through. Basically, because oft this new movement, I have higher enrollment at my school than ever.
When you, Mr. Apple, discussed connecting the curriculum and culture to the students and major needs of the community/society, I lit up. This gave me hope; someone sees the real issue! I feel that I am embracing this fact on a daily basis and I am learning what needs to be done and what should be done for my students if they ever re-enter in their public school districts. This would reverse a child’s failure to learn and would eventually, I believe, create new accountability for them because the curriculum would have meaning and “buy in” for them because it would cater to who they are and their background. The only hard part is how. How do we allow this flexibility and go from high control and conforming education standards to needs based curriculum that is child centered?
Maybe this is your next publication, Mr. Pinar and Mr. Apple. I would love to hear your response and would be interested to trouble shoot and put together a “mock plan” of how to accomplish this type of education in the future. Thank you for your work and I look forward to reading more.
Sincerely,
Miss Lannie Davis